The Supreme Court of India and International Law: A topsy-turvy Journey from Dualism to Monism

43(3) Liverpool Law Review, 2022, 571-595

33 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2022 Last revised: 15 Nov 2022

See all articles by Prabhash Ranjan

Prabhash Ranjan

Jindal Global Law School, O P Jindal Global University

Date Written: May 6, 2022

Abstract

In the relationship between international law and national law, the normative framework enshrined in the Indian Constitution is of formal dualism. Thus, international law does not become part of the Indian legal regime until it goes through a process of transformation i.e. the parliament passing legislation to implement international law. However, the Supreme Court of India has moved away from this formal dualism toward the monist tradition of incorporating international law in the domestic legal regime provided the international law is not inconsistent with domestic law. This paper traces this journey. It argues that while the Supreme Court has indeed moved towards the doctrine of incorporation, this shift is riddled with several inconsistencies and incoherence. While judicial incorporation of international law may not be a bad thing, the court needs to demonstrate greater analytical rigour in dealing with international law, both treaty law and binding customary norms.

Keywords: Supreme Court of India, India, international law, domestic courts, dualism, monism, custom, treaty, transformation, incorporation

Suggested Citation

Ranjan, Prabhash, The Supreme Court of India and International Law: A topsy-turvy Journey from Dualism to Monism (May 6, 2022). 43(3) Liverpool Law Review, 2022, 571-595, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4210902 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4210902

Prabhash Ranjan (Contact Author)

Jindal Global Law School, O P Jindal Global University ( email )

Sonipat
Sonipat, WA
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
270
Abstract Views
1,244
Rank
206,099
PlumX Metrics